Visual reports and PDFs
Show confirmed findings by severity, remediation priorities, source context, and a detailed evidence appendix.
Bring clarity to your security review. Keep the findings, scope, and remediation together—then turn them into a report people can act on.
Internal access · isolated project workspaces
Evidence, impact, and the next decision.
Enforce the tenant boundary before changing a protected record.
Scope and validation limits stay visible alongside the findings.
Start with a defined scope. Preserve the original evidence. Give every audience the detail they need.
Create a project and an audit program. Record the codebase, scope, source revision, and review depth.
Run the security-audit workflow in Codex, then import its findings, coverage ledger, architecture notes, and run metadata.
Inspect the findings, track remediation, and export a visual PDF or a reviewed 20-second video summary.
A concise summary for a decision-maker. A traceable technical record for the person making the fix.
Show confirmed findings by severity, remediation priorities, source context, and a detailed evidence appendix.
Use Brag and Hyperframes to turn reviewed executive content into a short presentation. Technical evidence stays in the report.
Track open work, fixes in progress, and items ready for retest. Keep those updates separate from the original audit verdict.
Confirmed findings, validation blockers, and coverage gaps are different things. PreCheck keeps them distinct.
Severity is assigned only to confirmed records. Missing coverage remains visible. An empty findings list is never presented as proof that a codebase is free of vulnerabilities.
Accounts have separate workspaces. Public registration is disabled; administrators can invite additional accounts when needed.
Open your workspace and prepare the first audit program.